yap sirna (Sangon Biotech)
Structured Review

Yap Sirna, supplied by Sangon Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/yap+sirna/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__05__13__724874-145-10-12?v=Sangon+Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Modeling Meibomian Gland Development and Dysfunction: A Mouse-Derived Organoid System Reveals Hippo-YAP as a Critical Regulator"
Article Title: Modeling Meibomian Gland Development and Dysfunction: A Mouse-Derived Organoid System Reveals Hippo-YAP as a Critical Regulator
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.13.724874
Figure Legend Snippet: (A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of YAP in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of YAP-siRNA, with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).
Techniques Used: Control, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Expressing, Western Blot, Transfection
Figure Legend Snippet: (A and B) Immunofluorescence of YAP in MG of 8-week-old and 24-month-old mice, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. And the ratio of nuclear YAP to cytoplasm YAP, three cells were randomly selected for measurement and averaged in each sample (n=5). (C and D) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with LPS, with PBS as control. Number of budding (n=62) and the surface area (n=57) of mMGOs were quantified. (E) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (F) TUNEL staining of mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (G) Immunofluorescence of K10 in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (H) Percentage of Ki67 positive cells in (C) (n=6). (I) The percentage of TUNEL positive cells in (D) (n=5). (J) The intensities of K10 in (E) (n=3). (K and L) Immunofluorescence of YAP in LPS-induced MGD model in vitro , nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. And the ratio of nuclear YAP to cytoplasm YAP (n=4). (M and N) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3 after maturation, with NC-siRNA as control. Changes of budding number were quantified (n=3). (O and P) Bright-field images of mMGOs cultured with XMU-MP-1 after maturation, with DMSO as control. Number of budding (n=33) and the surface area (n=39) of mMGOs were quantified. Scale bars represent 250 µm in (C), 100 µm in (M) and (O), 50 µm in (E), (F) and (G), 25 µm in (A) and (K).
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Control, TUNEL Assay, Staining, In Vitro, Transfection, Cell Culture
