Review




Structured Review

Sangon Biotech yap sirna
(A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of <t>YAP</t> in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of <t>YAP-siRNA,</t> with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).
Yap Sirna, supplied by Sangon Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/yap+sirna/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__05__13__724874-145-10-12?v=Sangon+Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
yap sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Modeling Meibomian Gland Development and Dysfunction: A Mouse-Derived Organoid System Reveals Hippo-YAP as a Critical Regulator"

Article Title: Modeling Meibomian Gland Development and Dysfunction: A Mouse-Derived Organoid System Reveals Hippo-YAP as a Critical Regulator

Journal: bioRxiv

doi: 10.64898/2026.05.13.724874

(A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of YAP in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of YAP-siRNA, with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).
Figure Legend Snippet: (A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of YAP in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of YAP-siRNA, with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).

Techniques Used: Control, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Expressing, Western Blot, Transfection

(A and B) Immunofluorescence of YAP in MG of 8-week-old and 24-month-old mice, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. And the ratio of nuclear YAP to cytoplasm YAP, three cells were randomly selected for measurement and averaged in each sample (n=5). (C and D) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with LPS, with PBS as control. Number of budding (n=62) and the surface area (n=57) of mMGOs were quantified. (E) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (F) TUNEL staining of mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (G) Immunofluorescence of K10 in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (H) Percentage of Ki67 positive cells in (C) (n=6). (I) The percentage of TUNEL positive cells in (D) (n=5). (J) The intensities of K10 in (E) (n=3). (K and L) Immunofluorescence of YAP in LPS-induced MGD model in vitro , nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. And the ratio of nuclear YAP to cytoplasm YAP (n=4). (M and N) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3 after maturation, with NC-siRNA as control. Changes of budding number were quantified (n=3). (O and P) Bright-field images of mMGOs cultured with XMU-MP-1 after maturation, with DMSO as control. Number of budding (n=33) and the surface area (n=39) of mMGOs were quantified. Scale bars represent 250 µm in (C), 100 µm in (M) and (O), 50 µm in (E), (F) and (G), 25 µm in (A) and (K).
Figure Legend Snippet: (A and B) Immunofluorescence of YAP in MG of 8-week-old and 24-month-old mice, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. And the ratio of nuclear YAP to cytoplasm YAP, three cells were randomly selected for measurement and averaged in each sample (n=5). (C and D) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with LPS, with PBS as control. Number of budding (n=62) and the surface area (n=57) of mMGOs were quantified. (E) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (F) TUNEL staining of mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (G) Immunofluorescence of K10 in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (H) Percentage of Ki67 positive cells in (C) (n=6). (I) The percentage of TUNEL positive cells in (D) (n=5). (J) The intensities of K10 in (E) (n=3). (K and L) Immunofluorescence of YAP in LPS-induced MGD model in vitro , nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. And the ratio of nuclear YAP to cytoplasm YAP (n=4). (M and N) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3 after maturation, with NC-siRNA as control. Changes of budding number were quantified (n=3). (O and P) Bright-field images of mMGOs cultured with XMU-MP-1 after maturation, with DMSO as control. Number of budding (n=33) and the surface area (n=39) of mMGOs were quantified. Scale bars represent 250 µm in (C), 100 µm in (M) and (O), 50 µm in (E), (F) and (G), 25 µm in (A) and (K).

Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Control, TUNEL Assay, Staining, In Vitro, Transfection, Cell Culture



Similar Products

86
Sangon Biotech yap sirna
(A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of <t>YAP</t> in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of <t>YAP-siRNA,</t> with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).
Yap Sirna, supplied by Sangon Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/yap+sirna/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__05__13__724874-145-10-12?v=Sangon+Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
yap sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology shrna targeting yap
(A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of <t>YAP</t> in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of <t>YAP-siRNA,</t> with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).
Shrna Targeting Yap, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/yap+sirna/pm41671087-431-62-66?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
shrna targeting yap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Bioneer Corporation sirnas targeting yap cagaagaucaaagcuacuudtdt
(A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of <t>YAP</t> in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of <t>YAP-siRNA,</t> with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).
Sirnas Targeting Yap Cagaagaucaaagcuacuudtdt, supplied by Bioneer Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/yap+sirna/pm41608625-110-1-20?v=Bioneer+Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sirnas targeting yap cagaagaucaaagcuacuudtdt - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology yap shrna plasmid
(A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of <t>YAP</t> in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of <t>YAP-siRNA,</t> with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).
Yap Shrna Plasmid, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/yap+sirna/pm41350729-64-30-53?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
yap shrna plasmid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Azenta aav9 yap shrna 1 viral particles
(A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of <t>YAP</t> in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of <t>YAP-siRNA,</t> with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).
Aav9 Yap Shrna 1 Viral Particles, supplied by Azenta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/yap+sirna/pmc12549912-514-3-11?v=Azenta
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aav9 yap shrna 1 viral particles - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Genechem yap sirna
(A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of <t>YAP</t> in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of <t>YAP-siRNA,</t> with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).
Yap Sirna, supplied by Genechem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/yap+sirna/pm41104600-58-0-9?v=Genechem
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
yap sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology yap sirna
The <t>YAP</t> pathway is regulated by HIF‐1α in hypoxia‐exposed HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells. (A, B) HIF‐1α protein level was decreased in HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells 48 h after transfection with siHIF‐1α. *** p < 0.001 vs. siCtrl group. (C, D) HIF‐1α protein level was increased in HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells 48 h after transfection with HIF‐1α overexpression vector. *** p < 0.001 vs. Vector group. (E‐G) HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells were transfected with siCtrl or siHIF‐1α under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 48 h. Western blot analysis was conducted to detect the expression levels of p‐YAP and YAP. *** p < 0.001 vs. Normoxia + siCtrl group. ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 vs. Hypoxia + siCtrl group. (H‐J) HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells were transfected with control empty vector or HIF‐1α overexpression vector under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 48 h. Western blot analysis was conducted to detect the expression levels of p‐YAP and YAP. Data are presented as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. Normoxia + Vector group. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. Hypoxia + Vector group. siCtrl, control <t>siRNA.</t> siHIF‐1α, siRNA targeting HIF‐1α. Vector, control empty vector. HIF‐1α, HIF‐1α overexpression vector.
Yap Sirna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/yap+sirna/pmc12955921-61-15-28?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
yap sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of YAP in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of YAP-siRNA, with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Modeling Meibomian Gland Development and Dysfunction: A Mouse-Derived Organoid System Reveals Hippo-YAP as a Critical Regulator

doi: 10.64898/2026.05.13.724874

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A and B) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with verteporfin, with DMSO as control. The axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were measured using ImageJ (n=35). (C and D) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (E and F) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (C and D) (n=8). (G) Relative mRNA expression of Ki67 (n=4) and Pcna (n=3) in mMGOs. (H and I) Western blot analysis of YAP in mMGOs transfected with 3 types of YAP-siRNA, with NC-siRNA as control, the protein levels were quantified by densitometry (n=3). (J and K) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3, with NC-siRNA as control. And the axial length and the surface area of mMGOs were quantified (n=24). (L and M) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 and EdU staining in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (N and O) Percentage of Ki67 and EdU positive cells in (L and M) (n=4). Scale bars represent 100 µm in (A) and (J), 50 µm in (C), (D), (L) and (M).

Article Snippet: YAP expression was knocked down in mMGOs transfection with the YAP siRNA (Sangon Biotech) using RNATransMate (Sangon Biotech, E607402) following the manufacturer’s instruction, with negative control (NC) siRNA as control.

Techniques: Control, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Expressing, Western Blot, Transfection

(A and B) Immunofluorescence of YAP in MG of 8-week-old and 24-month-old mice, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. And the ratio of nuclear YAP to cytoplasm YAP, three cells were randomly selected for measurement and averaged in each sample (n=5). (C and D) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with LPS, with PBS as control. Number of budding (n=62) and the surface area (n=57) of mMGOs were quantified. (E) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (F) TUNEL staining of mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (G) Immunofluorescence of K10 in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (H) Percentage of Ki67 positive cells in (C) (n=6). (I) The percentage of TUNEL positive cells in (D) (n=5). (J) The intensities of K10 in (E) (n=3). (K and L) Immunofluorescence of YAP in LPS-induced MGD model in vitro , nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. And the ratio of nuclear YAP to cytoplasm YAP (n=4). (M and N) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3 after maturation, with NC-siRNA as control. Changes of budding number were quantified (n=3). (O and P) Bright-field images of mMGOs cultured with XMU-MP-1 after maturation, with DMSO as control. Number of budding (n=33) and the surface area (n=39) of mMGOs were quantified. Scale bars represent 250 µm in (C), 100 µm in (M) and (O), 50 µm in (E), (F) and (G), 25 µm in (A) and (K).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Modeling Meibomian Gland Development and Dysfunction: A Mouse-Derived Organoid System Reveals Hippo-YAP as a Critical Regulator

doi: 10.64898/2026.05.13.724874

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A and B) Immunofluorescence of YAP in MG of 8-week-old and 24-month-old mice, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. And the ratio of nuclear YAP to cytoplasm YAP, three cells were randomly selected for measurement and averaged in each sample (n=5). (C and D) Bright-field images of mMGOs treated with LPS, with PBS as control. Number of budding (n=62) and the surface area (n=57) of mMGOs were quantified. (E) Immunofluorescence of Ki67 in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (F) TUNEL staining of mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (G) Immunofluorescence of K10 in mMGOs, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (H) Percentage of Ki67 positive cells in (C) (n=6). (I) The percentage of TUNEL positive cells in (D) (n=5). (J) The intensities of K10 in (E) (n=3). (K and L) Immunofluorescence of YAP in LPS-induced MGD model in vitro , nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. And the ratio of nuclear YAP to cytoplasm YAP (n=4). (M and N) Bright-field images of mMGOs transfected with YAP-siRNA 3 after maturation, with NC-siRNA as control. Changes of budding number were quantified (n=3). (O and P) Bright-field images of mMGOs cultured with XMU-MP-1 after maturation, with DMSO as control. Number of budding (n=33) and the surface area (n=39) of mMGOs were quantified. Scale bars represent 250 µm in (C), 100 µm in (M) and (O), 50 µm in (E), (F) and (G), 25 µm in (A) and (K).

Article Snippet: YAP expression was knocked down in mMGOs transfection with the YAP siRNA (Sangon Biotech) using RNATransMate (Sangon Biotech, E607402) following the manufacturer’s instruction, with negative control (NC) siRNA as control.

Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Control, TUNEL Assay, Staining, In Vitro, Transfection, Cell Culture

The YAP pathway is regulated by HIF‐1α in hypoxia‐exposed HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells. (A, B) HIF‐1α protein level was decreased in HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells 48 h after transfection with siHIF‐1α. *** p < 0.001 vs. siCtrl group. (C, D) HIF‐1α protein level was increased in HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells 48 h after transfection with HIF‐1α overexpression vector. *** p < 0.001 vs. Vector group. (E‐G) HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells were transfected with siCtrl or siHIF‐1α under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 48 h. Western blot analysis was conducted to detect the expression levels of p‐YAP and YAP. *** p < 0.001 vs. Normoxia + siCtrl group. ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 vs. Hypoxia + siCtrl group. (H‐J) HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells were transfected with control empty vector or HIF‐1α overexpression vector under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 48 h. Western blot analysis was conducted to detect the expression levels of p‐YAP and YAP. Data are presented as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. Normoxia + Vector group. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. Hypoxia + Vector group. siCtrl, control siRNA. siHIF‐1α, siRNA targeting HIF‐1α. Vector, control empty vector. HIF‐1α, HIF‐1α overexpression vector.

Journal: The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences

Article Title: Vitexin Attenuates the Growth and Glycolysis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells by Suppressing the HIF ‐1α‐Modulated YAP Pathway Under Hypoxic Conditions

doi: 10.1002/kjm2.70111

Figure Lengend Snippet: The YAP pathway is regulated by HIF‐1α in hypoxia‐exposed HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells. (A, B) HIF‐1α protein level was decreased in HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells 48 h after transfection with siHIF‐1α. *** p < 0.001 vs. siCtrl group. (C, D) HIF‐1α protein level was increased in HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells 48 h after transfection with HIF‐1α overexpression vector. *** p < 0.001 vs. Vector group. (E‐G) HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells were transfected with siCtrl or siHIF‐1α under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 48 h. Western blot analysis was conducted to detect the expression levels of p‐YAP and YAP. *** p < 0.001 vs. Normoxia + siCtrl group. ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 vs. Hypoxia + siCtrl group. (H‐J) HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells were transfected with control empty vector or HIF‐1α overexpression vector under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 48 h. Western blot analysis was conducted to detect the expression levels of p‐YAP and YAP. Data are presented as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. Normoxia + Vector group. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. Hypoxia + Vector group. siCtrl, control siRNA. siHIF‐1α, siRNA targeting HIF‐1α. Vector, control empty vector. HIF‐1α, HIF‐1α overexpression vector.

Article Snippet: For constructing HIF‐1α‐ or YAP‐depleting cells, 10 μL of HIF‐1α siRNA (10 μM, siHIF‐1α), or YAP siRNA (10 μM, siYAP), or control siRNA (10 μM, siCtrl) obtained from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA) were transfected into HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells using a Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher).

Techniques: Transfection, Over Expression, Plasmid Preparation, Western Blot, Expressing, Control

Roles of HIF‐1α or the YAP pathway in the inhibitory effect of vitexin on hypoxia‐induced AML cell growth. (A) YAP was successfully knocked down in HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells through transfection with siYAP. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001 vs. siCtrl group. HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells co‐transfected with siCtrl/siYAP and Vector/HIF‐1α were treated with or without 40 μM vitexin under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 48 h. (B, C) MTT assay was performed to assess cell viability. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (D‐F) EdU incorporation assay was conducted to assess cell proliferation. Scale bar = 20 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001. (G, H) Western blot analysis was conducted to detect the expression levels of PCNA and Ki67. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. siCtrl, control siRNA. siYAP, siRNA targeting YAP. Vector, control empty vector. HIF‐1α, HIF‐1α overexpression vector.

Journal: The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences

Article Title: Vitexin Attenuates the Growth and Glycolysis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells by Suppressing the HIF ‐1α‐Modulated YAP Pathway Under Hypoxic Conditions

doi: 10.1002/kjm2.70111

Figure Lengend Snippet: Roles of HIF‐1α or the YAP pathway in the inhibitory effect of vitexin on hypoxia‐induced AML cell growth. (A) YAP was successfully knocked down in HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells through transfection with siYAP. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001 vs. siCtrl group. HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells co‐transfected with siCtrl/siYAP and Vector/HIF‐1α were treated with or without 40 μM vitexin under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 48 h. (B, C) MTT assay was performed to assess cell viability. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (D‐F) EdU incorporation assay was conducted to assess cell proliferation. Scale bar = 20 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001. (G, H) Western blot analysis was conducted to detect the expression levels of PCNA and Ki67. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. siCtrl, control siRNA. siYAP, siRNA targeting YAP. Vector, control empty vector. HIF‐1α, HIF‐1α overexpression vector.

Article Snippet: For constructing HIF‐1α‐ or YAP‐depleting cells, 10 μL of HIF‐1α siRNA (10 μM, siHIF‐1α), or YAP siRNA (10 μM, siYAP), or control siRNA (10 μM, siCtrl) obtained from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA) were transfected into HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells using a Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher).

Techniques: Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, MTT Assay, Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Over Expression

Roles of HIF‐1α or the YAP pathway in the inhibitory effect of vitexin on hypoxia‐induced glycolysis. HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells co‐transfected with siCtrl/siYAP and Vector/HIF‐1α were treated with or without 40 μM vitexin under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 48 h. (A, B) Measurement of glucose uptake. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. (C, D) Measurement of lactate production. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. (E‐J) qRT‐PCR for detecting the mRNA expression levels of HK2 (E, F), PKM2 (G, H), and LDHA (I, J). Data are presented as mean ± SD. (K‐R) Western blot analysis for detecting the protein expression levels of HK2, PKM2, and LDHA in HL‐60 (K‐N) and KG‐1α (O‐R) cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. siCtrl, control siRNA. siYAP, siRNA targeting YAP. Vector, control empty vector. HIF‐1α, HIF‐1α overexpression vector.

Journal: The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences

Article Title: Vitexin Attenuates the Growth and Glycolysis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells by Suppressing the HIF ‐1α‐Modulated YAP Pathway Under Hypoxic Conditions

doi: 10.1002/kjm2.70111

Figure Lengend Snippet: Roles of HIF‐1α or the YAP pathway in the inhibitory effect of vitexin on hypoxia‐induced glycolysis. HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells co‐transfected with siCtrl/siYAP and Vector/HIF‐1α were treated with or without 40 μM vitexin under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 48 h. (A, B) Measurement of glucose uptake. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. (C, D) Measurement of lactate production. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. (E‐J) qRT‐PCR for detecting the mRNA expression levels of HK2 (E, F), PKM2 (G, H), and LDHA (I, J). Data are presented as mean ± SD. (K‐R) Western blot analysis for detecting the protein expression levels of HK2, PKM2, and LDHA in HL‐60 (K‐N) and KG‐1α (O‐R) cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. siCtrl, control siRNA. siYAP, siRNA targeting YAP. Vector, control empty vector. HIF‐1α, HIF‐1α overexpression vector.

Article Snippet: For constructing HIF‐1α‐ or YAP‐depleting cells, 10 μL of HIF‐1α siRNA (10 μM, siHIF‐1α), or YAP siRNA (10 μM, siYAP), or control siRNA (10 μM, siCtrl) obtained from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA) were transfected into HL‐60 and KG‐1α cells using a Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher).

Techniques: Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Western Blot, Control, Over Expression